Reasons not to use Google > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제
  • 복사
  • 이동

To keep away from leading different people astray, please don't check with videos using the host title youtube.com or its aliases. Instead, make a link to invidio.us or one of the related proxy websites. Lead people to what is sweet, not to what is bad! Just make certain not to decide on a proxy that is "protected" by Cloudflare, since that sends its personal nonfree software program. This manner of referring is probably fail-secure: it might stop to work, but it would most likely not start main folks to run nonfree software program. There can also be a Firefox add-on to bypass that Javascript code. IceCat comes with that add-on by default. But that will not overcome the blockage of entry by way of Tor. If Google defeats the invidio.us proxies, I can ell you ways I will not reply. I will not surrender to youtube's nonfree software program and surveillance. I get pleasure from having access to the music and video there, however I will not do foolish or determined things to maintain that access. You shouldn't either! You do not need a special "platform" to put up an audio or video on the internet. You can put up an audio or video file on any web site. Just put the file on the location and link to it as if it had been an ordinary web page. All graphical browsers can handle that.Google censored set up of Samsung's advert-blocker, saying that blocking ads is "interference" with the sites that advertise (and surveil customers by means of advertisements). The advert-blocker is proprietary software, identical to this system (Google Play) that Google used to deny access to install it. I would refuse to have both of them on my laptop. Using a nonfree program provides the proprietor energy over you, and Google has exercised that power.

Surveillance

To establish yourself to a Google service is a grave error. - Google shops a list of all purchases a user has made that in any method point out the user's a gmail account. A consumer can delete purchases from this list, however only one buy at a time. Then that purchase disappears from the checklist that the user sees. Whether it remains in another record, we do not know, however I'd anticipate Google to answer that query with doubletalk. The article talks about what Google cites as its motive for doing this, but the motive is irrelevant - as a result of it's not an excuse.- Google's alarm system, "Nest Secure", turns out to have contained a microphone all along - however only lately began listening.- Google "sanitizes" its complete search logs, then publishes them; but it declines to explain the process of "sanitization", and there may be proof that users will be tracked via them.

The article also mentions two-factor authentication, which in and of itself might be a helpful approach (though I've learn that crackers can now defeat it), but has the flaw of requiring a mobile phone. My rule #2 for digital safety is to not have a mobile phone.

- Gmail was planned from the start as a massive surveillance system, to make psychological profiles not solely of Gmail customers however of everybody who sends mail to Gmail customers.- Google quietly mixed its ad-tracking profiles with its looking profiles.- Google has found a manner to track most credit card purchases in the US, even these not accomplished via a cellphone, and correlate that with individuals's online actions.

Google cannot do either facet to me, since I pay cash and do not carry a cell phone, and it doesn't know what internet sites I look at.

- Google Play sends app builders the private particulars of users that set up the app. Merely asking customers' "consent" for this isn't sufficient to legitimize that. We all know that the majority users have given up on reading simply what they're "consenting" to, and the reason is that they are accustomed to being informed, "If you want to make use of this service, it's essential to consent to blah blah blah." To truly protect folks's privateness, we should stop Google (and other corporations) from getting this private information in the first place!- Google shops an enormous quantity of knowledge on every consumer. This could include, in addition to the user's search history and advertising profile: - A timeline of the consumer's location throughout every day- Data on the usage of non-Google cellphone apps- 'Deleted' emails and files uploaded to Google Drive

Facebook and Google joined with ISPs to defeat a privacy initiative in California. Collecting the some ways Google is involved with US government surveillance, abroad and in the US, quantities to fairly a package.

Google invitations individuals to let Google monitor their telephone use, and all web use of their properties, for an extravagant payment of $20.

This malicious functionality will not be a secondary side of a program with another goal; this is the software's sole objective, and Google says so. But Google says it in a manner that encourages most individuals to ignore the main points and remain unaware of the extent of the spying. Anyway, mere consent does not legitimize massive surveillance.

Amazon and Google need "sensible" devices to report all activity to them.

In other phrases, if in case you have a "smart" (read "spy") lightbulb with that proposed feature, and tell an Amazon or Google listening machine about it, thenceforth any time you switched it on or off regardless of how, it would ship a report back to Amazon or Google.

Even right now, the only method to make "sensible" products protected is to make sure they cannot hook up with anyone else's systems.

Another piece of Google's surveillance capitalism: when stores mail receipts to a gmail.com account, Google figures out and information who bought what.

I feel that the shop itself should not get this info, porn video which is why I at all times pay cash and by no means give my identify.

*Google faces lawsuit over monitoring in apps even when customers opted out.*

Terms of Service

- Google cuts off accounts for customers that resell Pixel telephones. They lose access to all of their mail and documents saved in Google servers below that account. It should be unlawful to place any "phrases of service" on a bodily product. It should even be illegal to close an account on a service with out letting the consumer download whatever was saved there. These events provide one other reason why schools must never ask a pupil to use a service account linked to the pupil's title.

Censorship

- Amazon and Google have reduce off area-fronting, a function used to enable folks in tyrannical nations to reach communication methods that are banned there.- French blogger Claims YouTube Tried to Censor Juncker Interview.- Google has agreed to perform particular censorship of Youtube for the government of Pakistan, deleting views that the state opposes. This may assist the illiberal Pakistani state suppress dissent.

- Youtube's "content ID" mechanically deletes posted movies in a way copyright regulation doesn't require.- YouTube has made non-public deals with the copyright trade to censor works which might be truthful use. More info.

- Google shut off Alexa O'Brien's Google Drive account, denying her access to it, because her reporting on Chelsea Manning's trial included copies of al-Qa'ida propaganda that was introduced as proof.- Google is deleting porn artists' porn movies from their very own personal accounts, quietly and mysteriously.

Never trust a remote storage company to keep something but a spare backup copy. While you retailer that, put your recordsdata into an archive and encrypt it in order that the corporate can't tell what's in them - not even their file names.

- Vox legal professionals got Youtube to take down criticisms of a video published by Vox, and threaten the critics with punishment, too.

The movies had been almost absolutely truthful use, however Youtube decided in opposition to the critics anyway. This exhibits how Youtube's common submission to the copyright trade constrict's people's rights.

Miscellaneous

- Google is a tax dodger. After all, it isn't the only one, but that is no excuse.- Google supports the TPP due to three mostly-evil provisions that would benefit Google.- Google has made it in order that Chrome now automatically installs the DRM module. This makes it harmful for security researchers in the US to investigate doable insecurity in Chrome. More info.- Support is growing for reverting US antitrust law to what it was before Reagan weakened it. That's the reason Google is using its influence to weaken people who marketing campaign in opposition to this.

How I Got Fired From a D.C. Think Tank for Fighting Against the ability of Google.

- Google advised a reporter in 2011 that websites with out "+1" buttons could be punished with lower search rankings. When she revealed a story in Forbes about that, Google pressured Forbes to take it down.